Optimization ROI · AI Workloads
How much could Artemis save
your business?
Estimate engineering savings and broader business outcome uplift from optimizing your production AI codebases — inference, agents, and latency-critical infrastructure.
Step 1 — Inputs
Your team & workloads
Engineers on AI workloads
35 FTEs
Monthly AI & cloud spend iTotal monthly spend across AI APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, NVIDIA NIM) and cloud compute (Databricks, GPU hosting).
£120k/mo
Production AI workloads
5 pipelines
Pre-filled benchmarks — adjust if needed
Avg. engineer cost
£180k/yr
BENCHMARK
adjust ▾
£180k
% time on optimization & tuning
20%
BENCHMARK
adjust ▾
20%
Annual business cost at stake
£25M
The annual cost most affected by your system's performance — e.g. revenue at risk from latency, cloud budget, logistics & ops spend, or cost of errors & rework.
£25M
£5M £500M
Results update live as you adjust inputs
Step 2 — Outputs
Estimated annual saving (conservative)
at least $2.3M
Engineering savings + business outcome uplift
~7x return
A
Engineering & Infra Savings
calculated from your inputs
Eng. time recovered
$819k
40,950 hrs / yr
AI & API cost saving
$150k
~25% reduction
Compute saving
$120k
~20% reduction
B
Business Outcome Uplift
benchmarked on real Artemis workloads
Conservative
3%
improvement
$1.5M
MOST COMMON
Typical
12%
improvement
$6M
Best case
36%
improvement
$18M
🔒
Your results are ready
$2.3M – $19.6M estimated annually
Enter your details to unlock the full breakdown.
Please fill in all fields with a valid work email
Estimated annual value
$2.3M – $19.6M
Conservative estimate · engineering savings + business outcome uplift
~7x return
// payback ~6 wks
A
Engineering & Infra Savings
calculated from your inputs
Eng. time recovered
$819k
40,950 hrs / yr
AI & API cost saving
$150k
~25% reduction
Compute saving
$120k
~20% reduction
Engineering time
$819k
AI & API cost
$150k
Compute & infra
$120k
B
Business Outcome Uplift
benchmarked on real Artemis workloads
Based on your $50M annual cost base × Artemis improvement range
Conservative
3%
improvement
$1.5M
annual saving
MOST COMMON
Typical
12%
improvement
$6M
annual saving
Best case
36%
improvement
$18M
annual saving
Where you land depends on your specific workload and stack — that's what the 30-min call scopes.
Find out where you land.
Talk to an optimization engineer.
Methodology: Track A — engineer saving based on 65% recovery of time spent on optimization, consistent with TurinTech internal project observations (tasks reduced from weeks to days; conservative estimate against an observed 75–80% recovery range). AI & API cost saving scales from 25% to 35% based on production workload count, informed by TurinTech-published results: −26% cost per token on vLLM · Qwen3-4B AWQ · Intel Xeon CPU (inference optimization), and −36.9% token spend reduction on CrewAI multi-agent workflows (agentic software). Compute saving at ~20% baseline, informed by Artemis inference results: +25% faster inference on Nvidia GPU (Whisper) implies ~20% reduction in GPU-hours for equivalent workloads. Track B — improvement range (3–36%) informed by published Artemis results: +3% vehicle routing throughput (planning & scheduling); +11.9% faster runs on dbt/Snowflake pipelines (data pipeline); +32.7% faster runtime on QuantLib C++ (latency-critical infra). Business outcome saving = annual cost base × improvement %. Artemis engagement cost estimated at 15% of Track A savings — actual contract value varies by scope. Figures are illustrative estimates based on your inputs; actual results vary by workload, team structure, and engagement scope. This calculator is for illustrative purposes only and does not constitute financial or professional advice. Contact TurinTech for a workload-specific assessment. · turintech.ai